What is a casualty?
Something happened! Is it a casualty?
“Personal
losses” generally are not deductible except when they qualify as a casualty,
the Courts and IRS are leery of personal assets that appear to be the subject
of a casualty by some contrivance.
A loss upon
condemnation of a personal residence was not a casualty because there was no
proximate relationship between a casualty event and the loss even though the
property was taken for a flood control project.
The law establishes three bases for losses allowed as
deductible by individuals in:
1 losses incurred in a
trade or business;
2 losses incurred in any
transaction entered into for profit, though not connected with a trade or
business; and;
3 … losses of property
not connected with a trade or business or a transaction entered into for
profit, if such losses arise from fire, storm, shipwreck, or other casualty, or from
theft. (Emphasis added.)
IRS Publication 547, Non-Business Disaster, Casualties and
Thefts, defines a “casualty” as the complete or partial destruction or
loss of property resulting from an identifiable
event that is “...sudden, unexpected
or unusual in nature.”
In
1959 the IRS ruled:
The term “casualty”
denotes an accident, a mishap, some sudden invasion by a
hostile agency; it excludes the progressive deterioration of property through
a steadily operating cause. Also, an accident or casualty proceeds from an
unknown cause, or is an unusual effect of a known cause. Either may be said to
occur by chance and unexpectedly. To be of the same nature or kind as fires,
storms and shipwreck for purposes of section 165(c)(3) of the code, an event
must first be unexpected and, second, be identifiable as the cause of
a provable loss. There must be a provable event which not only has a
casual relation to the diminution in value of the damaged property but
can be isolated from other events or sequences leading to changes in
value in the damaged property. The primary significance of the latter
requirement is that generally the amount of a casualty loss deduction is in
part determined with reference to the value of the property before the casualty
and its value immediately after the casualty so that it is necessary to fix a
time at which the casualty took place. (Emphasis added, internal
references omitted)
A 1967 Tax Court case states:
“unexpected,
accidental force exerted on property and the taxpayer is powerless to prevent …
[it, the] direct and proximate damage causes a loss … similar to losses arising
from the causes specifically enumerated in section 165(c)(3).” “[M]ere negligence on the part of the
owner-taxpayer has long been held not to necessitate the holding that an
occurrence falls outside the ambit of ‘other casualty.’” The Court limits
the IRS stating: “To hold that a loss must be cataclysmic in order to
qualify as some ‘other casualty’ under section 165(c)(3) would be to limit the
availability of the casualty loss deduction to circumstances which are
virtually catastrophic in character.”
While the taxpayer may be powerless, has the taxpayer taken
all reasonable steps to limit the loss as it occurs where possible.
Additionally, has the taxpayer processed all appropriate insurance claims? The
tax law is not an alternative to appropriate care and mitigation, nor is the
tax law an alternative to filing an insurance claim. However, taxpayers,
generally, are not required to purchase insurance simply because it is
available.
In the case of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal
ruled that gradual deterioration of property caused either by the action
of the elements or other factors does not constitute a casualty loss.
Generally, six characteristics must be present for
the loss to have any possibility of being classified as a casualty: Physical
damage; Identifiable event; Sudden; and Unexpected and Unusual.
An accidental loss may qualify as a casualty loss if it exhibits those
qualities. Inherent in these qualities, the taxpayer, generally, must show the
sixth element, he is powerless to prevent the damage from occurring.
All rights to reproduce or
quote any part of the chapter in any other publication are reserved by the
author. Republication rights limited by the publisher of the book in which this
chapter appears also apply.
JOHN TRAPANI
|
||
Certified Public Accountant
|
||
2975 E. Hillcrest Drive #403
|
||
Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
|
||
(805) 497-4411
E-mail John@TrapaniCPA.com
|
||
Website: www.TrapaniCPA.com
|
||
Blog:
www.AccountantForDisasteRrecovery.com
|
||
It All Adds Up For You
|
||
This material
was contributed by John Trapani. A Certified Public Accountant who has assisted
taxpayers since 1976, in analyzing and reporting transactions of the type
covered in this material.
Internal
Revenue Service Circular 230 Disclosure
This
is a general discussion of tax law. The application of the law to specific
facts may involve aspects that are not identical to the situations presented in
this material. Relying on this material does not qualify as tax advice for
purpose of mounting a defense of a tax position with the taxing authorities
The
analysis of the tax consequences of any event is based on tax laws in effect at
the time of the event.
This
material was completed on the date of the posting
© 2012, John Trapani, CPA,
No comments:
Post a Comment