TWO AUDIT TIPS
THAT COULD SAVE YOU A LOT OF STRESS
Here
are two audit tips that could save you a lot of stress;
IRS
CHIEF COUNSEL ADVICE (CCA) 200750016 RESTRICTS IRS ABILTY TO USE 20/20
HINDSIGHT AGAINST TAXPAYERS IN AUDITS OF DISASTER RETURNS
Near the end of 2007, the IRS issued CCA 200750016, (November 08, 2007). It
deals with the issue of auditing taxpayers casualty losses. The IRS states that
the rules that apply to taxpayers do not apply to the IRS. The rules that the
IRS must comply with are more restrictive than what is expected of taxpayers.
The question arises because of year-ends and time-lines. The CCA states the
issue and its conclusion as follows:
ISSUE: Treatment of Gulf Hurricane casualty loss claims involving reimbursement, or a reasonable expectation of reimbursement, for the loss from federal or State grants.
CONCLUSION:
The same rule does not apply under the I.R.C. §165 regulations to taxpayers claiming a casualty loss and to the
IRS when it examines a claimed loss.
Taxpayers
must reduce their casualty loss deduction by the amount of any reimbursements
received or by the amount of reasonably expected prospective reimbursements as
determined by the end of the taxable year of the casualty. Taxpayers may also
reduce their casualty loss deduction, if they wish, by the amount of any
reasonably expected prospective reimbursements, determined as of the time of
the filing of the tax return claiming the loss ****
Examiners
use the same criteria as the taxpayer, but must base their determination of the
facts and circumstances as of the end of the tax year for which the casualty
loss is claimed. ***** the IRS may not reduce casualty losses claimed for 2005
to reflect receipt of a Road Home grant (or of any other reimbursement) during
2006 (or 2007), or to reflect an expectation of reimbursement from such grants
or other sources arising after the taxable year end and by the time the return
was filed or of the examination.
This CCA
indicates two important issues. one,
the IRS is auditing losses, even in one of the most economically depressed disaster
areas and; two; they cannot use
20/20 hindsight two years later after a good faith return has been filed. This
is consistent with the theory that each tax year stands on its own merits based
on the facts and circumstances that exist at the time. This is a two edged
sword, in this case it may assist the taxpayer in avoiding penalties and
interest costs that might arise in an examination of their tax return filed in
connection with a disaster loss claim, but it reminds us of the taxpayers’
responsibility to be diligent in reporting the fact of the disaster.
While these CCAs are generally restricted to a
single taxpayer or event, as in this case, the general application is worth
mentioning to an agent, if your audit is going bad due to an examiner’s use of
information that was not available to you at the time you prepared the tax
return.
IRS ISSUED REVENUE
PROCEDURE 2007-56:
COMPLIANCE DEFERRALS (§7508A): When a disaster occurs, the IRS will impose §7508A to provide relief from many filing deadlines. The section
also creates suspensions of other periods, including many limitations on audit
statute of limitation time constraints. Regulations issued during 2008 provide
detail explanations of how the section would be applied in a disaster. The
regulations (§301.7509A-1) include 8 examples that are
very detail. The professional should match-up the regulations with the
taxpayers’ situation at the time of the disaster to determine extensions that
may apply. The current delineation of all postponements are contained in Rev. Proc. 2007-56.
Rev. Proc. 2007-56
includes a complete list of tax related deadlines that may be deferred by the
IRS when a disaster strikes. Section .05 of the Procedure lists the types of
deferrals that are included in the list.
.05 Significant Changes. When a Presidentially declared
disaster occurs, the IRS guidance usually postpones the time to perform the
acts in section 301.7508A-1(c)(1) as well as this revenue procedure.
Certain acts, such as filing Tax Court petitions in innocent
spouse and other nondeficiency cases, and making certain distributions from,
contributions to, recharacterizations of, and certain transactions involving
qualified retirement plans (as defined in section 4974(c)), have been
added to this revenue procedure even though they are also listed as acts
postponed under section 301.7508A-1(c)(1).
© 2012, John Trapani, CPA,
All rights to reproduce or quote
any part of the chapter in any other publication are reserved by the author.
Republication rights limited by the publisher of the book in which this chapter
appears also apply.
JOHN
TRAPANI
|
||
Certified
Public Accountant
|
||
2975
E. Hillcrest Drive, #403
|
||
Thousand
Oaks, CA 91362
|
||
(805)
497-4411 E-mail John@TrapaniCPA.com
|
||
Website: www.TrapaniCPA.com
|
||
Blog:
www.AccountantForDisasteRrecovery.com
|
||
It All Adds Up For
You
|
||
Internal Revenue Service Circular 230 Disclosure
This is a general discussion of tax law. The application of
the law to specific facts may involve aspects that are not identical to the
situations presented in this material. Relying on this material does not
qualify as tax advice for purpose of mounting a defense of a tax position with
the taxing authorities
The analysis of the tax consequences of any event is based
on tax laws in effect at the time of the event.
This material was completed on the date of the posting
No comments:
Post a Comment